HP Z800 Workstation

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive77.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemHP Z800 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0AECh
Memory42.3 GB free of 48.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20180305
Uptime8.1 Days
Run DateFeb 01 '19 at 20:49
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5675
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
76.1% Very good
Memory 91.5
1-Core 84.9
2-Core 166
69% 114 Pts
4-Core 328
8-Core 666
58% 497 Pts
64-Core 1008
62% 1008 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$182
327GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 392 401 401 402 402 402 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
77.3% Very good
Read 394
Write 394
Mixed 326
SusWrite 400
85% 378 MB/s
4K Read 16.1
4K Write 41.9
4K Mixed 25.3
79% 27.8 MB/s
DQ Read 306
DQ Write 248
DQ Mixed 302
219% 285 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 124%
WD Re 2TB-$35
1TB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 122 122 122 123 124 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
71.2% Very good
Read 125
Write 114
Mixed 91.8
SusWrite 122
84% 113 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.1
236% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 83%
Lsilogic Logical Volume 600GB
461GB free
Firmware: 3000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 254 244 235 238 263 256 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 33% Great: 116%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 CE M393B1K70DH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70DH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70DH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-YH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-YH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-YH9 82GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 34816 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
52% Above average
MC Read 21.9
MC Write 16.4
MC Mixed 19.9
56% 19.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.4
SC Write 5.1
SC Mixed 7.9
22% 7.8 GB/s
Latency 65
62% 65 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 52%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z800 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,952 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z800 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback