Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 30% Sail boat	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 25% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (96th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 4 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	33.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Gigabyte AX370-Gaming
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming-CF (all builds)
Memory	13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180315
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 01 '19 at 00:09
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	26%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 3 1200-$100 83,528 User benchmarks, average bench 57% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	73.7% Very good	Memory 74.9 1-Core 108 2-Core 215 74% 133 Pts	4-Core 416 8-Core 425 56% 421 Pts	64-Core 425 26% 425 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 73.7% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% PNY(196E 11C3) ≥ 4GB; PNY XLR8 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti 4GB GDDR5 PCI CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 417.71 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	33.7% Below average	Lighting 42.5 Reflection 32.8 Parallax 39.7 35% 38.3 fps	MRender 38.3 Gravity 41.3 Splatting 38.2 32% 39.3 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 33.7% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80 69,224 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 12GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 502 Write 489 Mixed 368 101% 453 MB/s	4K Read 43.5 4K Write 106 4K Mixed 56.1 194% 68.4 MB/s	DQ Read 378 DQ Write 355 DQ Mixed 354 269% 362 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 115%
WD Blue 1TB (2015)-$40 52,322 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 876GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 144 145 145 145 144 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	82.8% Excellent	Read 148 Write 122 Mixed 90.5 SusWrite 141 92% 125 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1 200% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 82.8% Great: 87%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT4G4DFS824A.C8FF CT4G4DFS824A.C8FDD2 CT4G4DFS824A.C8FBD2 CT4G4DFS824A.C8FDD2 16GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	96.8% Outstanding	MC Read 38.4 MC Write 35.3 MC Mixed 33.6 102% 35.8 GB/s	SC Read 21.1 SC Write 33.3 SC Mixed 27.1 78% 27.2 GB/s	Latency 90.5 44% 90.5 ns
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 96.8% Great: 93%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming-CF Builds (Compare 358 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 42%

Speed boat

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 41%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming-CF

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $211Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	72x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	39x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $150Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	32x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	37x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	31x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	28x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $140Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	10x
870 EVO 1TBSamsung $105Bench 112%, 129,044 samples	8x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	8x

RAM
DDR4 2400 2OZ 2x8GBAdataBench 76%, 26,065 samples	14x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	13x
Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GBG.SKILL $31Bench 71%, 98,777 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $481

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16