Toshiba Satellite L845D

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.05% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive33.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemToshiba Satellite L845D  (all builds)
MotherboardAMD Pumori
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121205
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 31 '19 at 22:01
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 49%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-4500M APU
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
41.9% Average
Memory 69.6
1-Core 38.4
2-Core 69.1
40% 59 Pts
4-Core 85.8
8-Core 86
12% 85.9 Pts
64-Core 86.4
5% 86.4 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7640G
Toshiba(1179 FB55) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
4.05% Terrible
Lighting 4.63
Reflection 6.88
Parallax 3.91
4% 5.14 fps
MRender 4.9
Gravity 3.47
Splatting 7.57
5% 5.31 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.05%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89
86GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3FD6SD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 103 100 91 78 75 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
33.5% Below average
Read 283
Write 291
Mixed 248
SusWrite 104
52% 232 MB/s
4K Read 11.5
4K Write 20.9
4K Mixed 0.9
30% 11.1 MB/s
DQ Read 198
DQ Write 155
DQ Mixed 104
98% 153 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 88%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$45
309GB free
Firmware: AX003M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 88 89 89 89 88 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
48.4% Average
Read 81
Write 83.5
Mixed 31.5
SusWrite 87.8
52% 70.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
96% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend TS1GSK64V6H TS1GSK64W6H 16GB
800, 800 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.4% Poor
MC Read 14
MC Write 5.7
MC Mixed 10.5
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 5.8
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 7.1
17% 5.9 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 28.4%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Satellite L845D Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite L845D

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 12% - Very poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback