TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

N/A N/A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemN/A N/A  (all builds)
MotherboardKontron ETX-OH
Memory2.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display800 x 600 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150225
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 31 '19 at 15:09
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD G-T56N
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.65 GHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
31.4% Below average
Memory 56.4
1-Core 20.6
2-Core 40.6
28% 39.2 Pts
4-Core 40.4
8-Core 40.7
5% 40.6 Pts
64-Core 41
2% 41 Pts
Poor: 17% ↑
This bench: 31.4%
 Great: 31%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6320
Device(1022 1511) 384MB
Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 8.950.0.0
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
1% Terrible
Lighting 1.13
Reflection 1.23
Parallax 1.12
1% 1.16 fps
MRender 1.71
Gravity 0.83
Splatting 1.57
1% 1.37 fps
Poor: 1% ↑
This bench: 1%
 Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Delkin Devices CE08TFNHK-FD000-D 8GB
4GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 101130
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 27 28 27 29 29 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Kanguru FlashBlu 4GB
3GB free, PID 1101
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.4 7.2 9.1 8.7 9 8.8 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
5.47% Terrible
Read 17.4
Write 8
Mixed 9.2
SusWrite 8
13% 10.6 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
21% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑
This bench: 5.47%
 Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown VL47B5263A-F8SD 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 533 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
13.9% Very poor
MC Read 4.8
MC Write 3.6
MC Mixed 5
13% 4.47 GB/s
SC Read 3.2
SC Write 3.3
SC Mixed 3.8
10% 3.43 GB/s
Latency 139
29% 139 ns
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical N/A Builds (Compare 52 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: N/A N/A

CPU
Core i5-1035G4IntelBench 55%, 13,243 samples7x
Core i5-1035G1IntelBench 51%, 53,170 samples6x
Celeron N5095IntelBench 43%, 1,699 samples6x
GPU
HD Graphics 500IntelBench 1%, 7,914 samples10x
UHD G1IntelBench 5%, 68,603 samples9x
Iris Plus G4IntelBench 6%, 12,263 samples7x
SSD
512GB 512GBNetacBench 69%, 1,541 samples6x
S500 512GBBench 74%, 25 samples4x
128GB 128GBSSDBench 65%, 7,332 samples2x
RAM
2x8GBSamsungBench 62%, 17,576 samples8x
123456789012345678 4x1.5GBABCDBench 24%, 1,884 samples6x
1x8GBSamsungBench 32%, 1,334 samples5x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback