Acer AcerPower Series

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 8%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.83% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
MemoryThe RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemAcer AcerPower Series  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI MS-7309
Memory0.9 GB free of 1.5 GB @ 0.3 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20081020
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 31 '19 at 11:17
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon LE-1640
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
30.8% Below average
Memory 55.4
1-Core 39.3
2-Core 38.9
32% 44.5 Pts
4-Core 39.3
8-Core 37.8
5% 38.5 Pts
64-Core 38.3
2% 38.3 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI FirePro V3800 (FireGL)
HP(103C 210A) 512MB
Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 8.911.3.4000
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
3.83% Terrible
Lighting 4.97
Reflection 5.42
Parallax 4.78
4% 5.06 fps
MRender 3.9
Gravity 4.3
Splatting 4.22
3% 4.14 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.83%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung HD161HJ 160GB-$40
84GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JF10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 55 55 71 71 73 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
23.8% Poor
Read 19.6
Write 27.1
Mixed 24.8
SusWrite 63.2
25% 33.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
82% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 23.8%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1GB
null MHz
512, 1024 MB
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
12.5% Very poor
MC Read 4.2
MC Write 4.1
MC Mixed 3.3
11% 3.87 GB/s
SC Read 2.9
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 3.2
10% 3.5 GB/s
Latency 142
28% 142 ns
Poor: 5%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical AcerPower Series Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Acer AcerPower Series

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $20
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback