Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 117%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 112%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics114% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory40GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 40GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5
MotherboardGigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5  (all builds)
Memory36.2 GB free of 40 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180403
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 30 '19 at 15:18
Run Duration202 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU 16%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$184
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 92.7
1-Core 131
2-Core 318
97% 181 Pts
4-Core 595
8-Core 1,015
98% 805 Pts
64-Core 1,319
82% 1,319 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 102%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 2126 MHz, MLim: 2802 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 417.35
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Lighting 154
Reflection 156
Parallax 130
125% 146 fps
MRender 117
Gravity 148
Splatting 117
103% 127 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 114%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
164GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,213
Write 1,664
Mixed 712
336% 1,530 MB/s
4K Read 55.9
4K Write 163
4K Mixed 69.8
260% 96.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,265
DQ Write 1,121
DQ Mixed 829
721% 1,072 MB/s
Poor: 153% Great: 254%
Toshiba Q300. 960GB
456GB free
Firmware: SAFM12.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 452 482 250 270 290 292 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
98.2% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 484
Mixed 367
SusWrite 340
95% 422 MB/s
4K Read 27.1
4K Write 84.6
4K Mixed 40.6
138% 50.8 MB/s
DQ Read 348
DQ Write 310
DQ Mixed 193
182% 283 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 98.2%
Great: 103%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 376 376 378 377 378 378 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
27.3% Poor
Read 27.9
Write 250
Mixed 8.7
SusWrite 377
38% 166 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 11
4K Mixed 1.5
10% 4.6 MB/s
DQ Read 4.7
DQ Write 10
DQ Mixed 7.1
6% 7.27 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 27.3%
Great: 565%
Specific STORAGE DEVICE 8GB
6GB free, PID 201a
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.9 3.2 3.9 4.2 3.8 3.6 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
3.1% Terrible
Read 6.5
Write 0.5
Mixed 4.3
SusWrite 3.6
4% 3.72 MB/s
4K Read 5.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
22% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.1%
Great: 7%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB
14GB free, PID 6544
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.8 5.3 4.5 4.4 4.4 4.5 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
7.32% Terrible
Read 33.5
Write 5
Mixed 12.5
SusWrite 5
15% 14 MB/s
4K Read 5.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
22% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.32%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR4 3200 029E CMU32GX4M2C3000C15 04EF DDR4 3200 029E CMU32GX4M2C3000C15 40GB
3162, 3162, 3162, 3162 MHz
4096, 16384, 4096, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
84.9% Excellent
MC Read 30
MC Write 33.6
MC Mixed 26.1
85% 29.9 GB/s
SC Read 17.8
SC Write 34.7
SC Mixed 27.8
76% 26.8 GB/s
Latency 62.8
64% 62.8 ns
Poor: 85%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming 5-CF Builds (Compare 3,466 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5 - $226

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $1,029
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback