Asus EX-B250-V7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics30.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive52.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus EX-B250-V7  (all builds)
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180510
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJan 30 '19 at 15:11
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G4600-$27
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
71.3% Very good
Memory 90
1-Core 97.4
2-Core 176
72% 121 Pts
4-Core 308
8-Core 295
41% 301 Pts
64-Core 301
19% 301 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 1775 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.36
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30.4% Below average
Lighting 37
Reflection 31.2
Parallax 34
30% 34.1 fps
MRender 37.7
Gravity 38.3
Splatting 37
31% 37.7 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$26
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 90 45 4.1 13 97 MB/s
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
52.6% Above average
Read 248
Write 106
Mixed 174
SusWrite 47.4
32% 144 MB/s
4K Read 23.6
4K Write 73
4K Mixed 19.9
100% 38.8 MB/s
DQ Read 162
DQ Write 295
DQ Mixed 136
130% 198 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 85%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
679GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 157 160 162 162 159 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
96.5% Outstanding
Read 176
Write 164
Mixed 110
SusWrite 160
112% 152 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
231% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 96.5%
Great: 109%
SAMSUNG HD103SI 1TB
855GB free, PID 2339
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 39 40 41 40 41 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
19.3% Very poor
Read 37.8
Write 23.5
Mixed 34
SusWrite 40.3
46% 33.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
80% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 19.3%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2400 C15 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
78.5% Very good
MC Read 28.5
MC Write 30.6
MC Mixed 24.3
79% 27.8 GB/s
SC Read 18
SC Write 29.8
SC Mixed 23.8
68% 23.9 GB/s
Latency 67.2
60% 67.2 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EX-B250-V7 Builds (Compare 305 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus EX-B250-V7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $247
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $64
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback