Asus P5Q-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive53.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P5Q-E  (all builds)
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090406
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 30 '19 at 07:48
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X5472
LGA 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
51.7% Above average
Memory 75
1-Core 42.8
2-Core 84.2
44% 67.3 Pts
4-Core 167
8-Core 170
22% 168 Pts
64-Core 172
11% 172 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5670
Asus(1043 0356) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
6.4% Terrible
Lighting 7.77
Reflection 8.81
Parallax 6.12
6% 7.57 fps
MRender 9.05
Gravity 5.2
Splatting 9.26
6% 7.84 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.4%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M550 512GB-$283
240GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 196 165 154 164 145 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
53.9% Above average
Read 234
Write 246
Mixed 201
SusWrite 171
48% 213 MB/s
4K Read 21.4
4K Write 42.1
4K Mixed 22.7
84% 28.7 MB/s
DQ Read 183
DQ Write 194
DQ Mixed 162
129% 180 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 111%
Volume0 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 39 44 49 33 48 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
27.3% Poor
Read 51.2
Write 50
Mixed 17.9
SusWrite 43.6
30% 40.7 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
123% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 27.3%
Great: 125%
WD WD800JD-75MSA3 80GB-$105
19GB free
Firmware: 10.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 39 40 40 40 40 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
27.6% Poor
Read 55.5
Write 52.8
Mixed 39.9
SusWrite 39.8
35% 47 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
196% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 27.6%
Great: 33%
Generic External 1TB
654GB free, PID 0c31
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 27 28 28 28 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
18.3% Very poor
Read 32.2
Write 28.4
Mixed 27.4
SusWrite 27.7
39% 28.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
119% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 18.3%
Great: 25%
H/W RAID 5 12TB
2.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 26 25 26 28 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
11.7% Very poor
Read 31
Write 26.2
Mixed 20.4
SusWrite 26.3
34% 26 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.2
27% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.7%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
24.2% Poor
MC Read 7.6
MC Write 8.2
MC Mixed 7.4
22% 7.73 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 8
21% 7.2 GB/s
Latency 90.4
44% 90.4 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 24.2%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5Q-E Builds (Compare 194 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5Q-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $189
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback