Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 38% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	4.35% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	36.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-7300 APU (2014 M.Ka) 6,248 User benchmarks, average bench 31% Socket FS1r2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.9 GHz Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	37.4% Below average	Memory 59 1-Core 37.5 2-Core 65.4 36% 54 Pts	4-Core 94.7 8-Core 94 13% 94.3 Pts	64-Core 101 6% 101 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 37.4% Great: 38%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R6 Graphics 5,093 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Legend(17AA 3830) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 18.12.2 Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	4.35% Terrible	Lighting 4.67 Reflection 6.62 Parallax 6.75 4% 6.01 fps	MRender 6.33 Gravity 5.13 Splatting 7.87 5% 6.45 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 4.35% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS2 40G2G0A-00JH30 240GB 768 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 101GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 214 8.8 6.2 42 49 123 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	36.4% Below average	Read 351 Write 273 Mixed 174 SusWrite 73.8 48% 218 MB/s	4K Read 16.2 4K Write 26.8 4K Mixed 9.9 51% 17.6 MB/s	DQ Read 115 DQ Write 4.7 DQ Mixed 15.2 22% 45 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 36.4% Great: 56%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown RMT3170MN68F9F1600 Micron 8KTF51264HZ-1G6E1 8GB 34 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 800, 800 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	29.8% Poor	MC Read 13.5 MC Write 6.2 MC Mixed 12.6 31% 10.8 GB/s	SC Read 6.1 SC Write 5.5 SC Mixed 8.8 19% 6.8 GB/s	Latency 131 31% 131 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 29.8% Great: 56%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 34%

Sail boat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

CPU
A10-7300 APU (2014 M.Ka)AMDBench 31%, 6,248 samples	14x

GPU
Radeon R6 GraphicsAMDBench 3%, 5,093 samples	14x

SSD
Green 240GB (2018)WD $59Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	2x
512GB 512GBV-gen06sm20ar512sdkBench 63%, 11 samples	1x
PH6-CE240-L2 240GBBench 66%, 238 samples	1x

RAM
M471B1G73DB0-YK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 53%, 30,591 samples	2x
HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 1x8GBHynixBench 28%, 77,702 samples	1x
CT102464BF160B.C16 2x8GBCrucialBench 51%, 9,208 samples	1x

Value: 8% - Terrible

Total price: $59