Alienware 18

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics11.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive30.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemAlienware 18  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 01W2J2
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180129
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 29 '19 at 22:32
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4710MQ-$44
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
71.9% Very good
Memory 84
1-Core 99.4
2-Core 196
73% 126 Pts
4-Core 324
8-Core 500
51% 412 Pts
64-Core 501
31% 501 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 M290X
Dell(1028 05AB) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.3.4
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
11.6% Very poor
Lighting 14.5
Reflection 12.8
Parallax 19.1
12% 15.5 fps
MRender 10.2
Gravity 13.3
Splatting 15.8
11% 13.1 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.6%
Great: 27%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Acsc2m25 6mSA 185GB
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P083
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 160 170 169 176 175 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
30.1% Below average
Read 150
Write 153
Mixed 195
SusWrite 167
38% 166 MB/s
4K Read 18.1
4K Write 8
4K Mixed 11.3
46% 12.5 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 30.1%
Great: 60%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 1.5TB
647GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 83 87 86 90 89 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
44.2% Average
Read 268
Write 27.7
Mixed 150
SusWrite 82.9
29% 132 MB/s
4K Read 18.7
4K Write 49.5
4K Mixed 11.1
69% 26.4 MB/s
DQ Read 151
DQ Write 229
DQ Mixed 68.1
86% 150 MB/s
Poor: 102%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 400%
HGST Travelstar 7K750 2.5" 750GB-$77
335GB free
Firmware: JF4OA0D0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 97 99 100 99 99 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
55.2% Above average
Read 93.5
Write 92.5
Mixed 53.3
SusWrite 98.8
62% 84.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
129% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ40UG8EFU0-GN-F 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
55.4% Above average
MC Read 20.6
MC Write 20.6
MC Mixed 16.3
55% 19.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 18.3
SC Mixed 19.2
49% 17.1 GB/s
Latency 73.5
54% 73.5 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 18 Builds (Compare 368 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: Alienware 18

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $239
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback