Asus M5A97 R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics81.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive78.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M5A97 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory8.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150626
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 29 '19 at 21:57
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8150-$770
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
62.3% Good
Memory 80.6
1-Core 69
2-Core 130
57% 93.4 Pts
4-Core 239
8-Core 373
38% 306 Pts
64-Core 377
23% 377 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 417.71
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
81.9% Excellent
Lighting 93.3
Reflection 129
Parallax 133
76% 118 fps
MRender 111
Gravity 129
Splatting 105
93% 115 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 277 47 50 50 52 52 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
78.4% Very good
Read 437
Write 342
Mixed 280
SusWrite 87.9
64% 286 MB/s
4K Read 34.6
4K Write 73.6
4K Mixed 41.5
145% 49.9 MB/s
DQ Read 245
DQ Write 239
DQ Mixed 149
137% 211 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 108%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
74GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 127 121 128 123 127 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
70.7% Very good
Read 122
Write 114
Mixed 64.5
SusWrite 125
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.9
148% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 88%
Samsung HD251HJ 250GB-$39
59GB free
Firmware: 1AC0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 59 59 54 52 52 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
36.1% Below average
Read 69.7
Write 72.5
Mixed 41.5
SusWrite 55.8
44% 59.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 53%
WD WD800JD-75MSA3 80GB-$105
46GB free
Firmware: 06.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 57 58 58 58 58 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
32.8% Below average
Read 56.5
Write 57.8
Mixed 38.5
SusWrite 57.5
39% 52.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
149% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 32.8%
Great: 33%
Seagate ST380013AS 80GB-$75
12GB free
Firmware: 3.18
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 54 44 46 43 51 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
26.6% Poor
Read 43.7
Write 46.7
Mixed 33.2
SusWrite 48.6
32% 43.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
129% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 26.6%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-001.A00LF 9905471-017.A00LF 99U5471-001.A00LF 9905471-017.A00LF 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
44.2% Average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 15
MC Mixed 15.2
45% 15.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 12.6
29% 10 GB/s
Latency 79.4
50% 79.4 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 R2.0 Builds (Compare 2,842 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 R2.0 - $89

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $354
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback