HP EliteBook 8730w

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 25%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (4th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 96 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.77% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive22% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (95%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemHP EliteBook 8730w  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 30EC
Memory1.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920x1200x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111207
Uptime7.1 Days
Run DateJan 29 '19 at 14:11
Run Duration519 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU 95%

 PC Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo T9600-$170
Intel(R) Genuine processor, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
23.2% Poor
Memory 40
1-Core 22.2
2-Core 36.8
22% 33 Pts
4-Core 38.6
8-Core 42.2
5% 40.4 Pts
64-Core 44.3
3% 44.3 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 23.2%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 2700M
HP(103C 30EC) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.1
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
1.77% Terrible
Lighting 1.87
Reflection 5.19
Parallax 1.06
2% 2.71 fps
MRender 2.38
Gravity 3.23
Splatting 2.61
2% 2.74 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.77%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$31
144GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z33130RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 40 31 54 37 37 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
22% Poor
Read 172
Write 117
Mixed 186
SusWrite 42
29% 129 MB/s
4K Read 14.3
4K Write 25.6
4K Mixed 0.1
35% 13.3 MB/s
DQ Read 74.3
DQ Write 68.4
DQ Mixed 29.3
34% 57.3 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 22%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR2
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
8.96% Terrible
MC Read 2.9
MC Write 3.7
MC Mixed 2.5
9% 3.03 GB/s
SC Read 0.5
SC Write 3.1
SC Mixed 0.5
4% 1.37 GB/s
Latency 203
20% 203 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 8.96%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 8730w Builds (Compare 40 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 8730w

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 34% - Below average Total price: $230
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback