Asus X99-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics84.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive73.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus X99-A  (all builds)
Memory27.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160504
Uptime4.8 Days
Run DateJan 29 '19 at 13:40
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 24%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6800K-$103
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
80.2% Excellent
Memory 79.2
1-Core 114
2-Core 201
75% 132 Pts
4-Core 436
8-Core 713
70% 574 Pts
64-Core 905
56% 905 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 376.53
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
84.4% Excellent
Lighting 104
Reflection 112
Parallax 99.9
85% 105 fps
MRender 98.7
Gravity 104
Splatting 104
84% 102 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 363 277 122 110 108 112 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
73.7% Very good
Read 421
Write 346
Mixed 342
SusWrite 182
72% 323 MB/s
4K Read 30
4K Write 57.6
4K Mixed 39.8
127% 42.5 MB/s
DQ Read 24.5
DQ Write 239
DQ Mixed 296
180% 187 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 134%
Seagate Backup+ Desktop 3TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: D702
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 197 201 201 203 202 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 195
Write 155
Mixed 81.3
SusWrite 199
115% 158 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 113%
Great: 108%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 8GB
7GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.9 5.4 4.8 4.9 5.4 4.8 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
5.67% Terrible
Read 26.2
Write 9.2
Mixed 4.3
SusWrite 5
12% 11.2 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
12% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.67%
Great: 6%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 8GB
1GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.6 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 5.4 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 22.7
Write 3.7
SusWrite 4.7
10% 10.4 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
8% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (97th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
119% Outstanding
MC Read 43.1
MC Write 54.6
MC Mixed 45.3
136% 47.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 19.2
50% 17.4 GB/s
Latency 82
49% 82 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 119%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-A Builds (Compare 2,002 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus X99-A - $240

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $748
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback