Asus TUF H370-PRO GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 133% UFO	Desktop 94% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 122% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	139% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus TUF H370-PRO GAMING (all builds)
Memory	12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181115
Uptime	1.4 Days
Run Date	Jan 29 '19 at 12:08
Run Duration	183 Seconds
Run User	CHE-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700-$200 349,567 User benchmarks, average bench 87% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	98.4% Outstanding	Memory 95.5 1-Core 141 2-Core 275 95% 170 Pts	4-Core 544 8-Core 864 87% 704 Pts	64-Core 1,155 72% 1,155 Pts
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 98.4% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Asus(1043 85EA) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2803 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 417.71 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	139% Outstanding	Lighting 197 Reflection 209 Parallax 207 160% 204 fps	MRender 133 Gravity 198 Splatting 132 125% 154 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 139% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD WD4005FZBX-00K5WB0 4TB 14,138 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 2TB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 208 214 208 215 218 218 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	114% Outstanding	Read 185 Write 217 Mixed 94.9 SusWrite 214 130% 178 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 4.5 4K Mixed 1.6 315% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 114% Great: 136%
Disque virtuel Microsoft 1.5TB 19 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 793GB free Firmware: 1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 22 23 24 22 23 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	41.3% Average	Read 121 Write 116 Mixed 42 SusWrite 23.2 55% 75.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.4 79% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 41.3% Great: 53%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA632 1TB-$112 12,285 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 110GB free Firmware: JP4OA41A SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 33 33 28 26 28 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	38.1% Below average	Read 102 Write 110 Mixed 62.1 SusWrite 30.4 56% 76 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.8 150% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 38.1% Great: 76%
Disque virtuel Microsoft 1.5TB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1TB free Firmware: 1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 33 33 24 21 24 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	36.1% Below average	Read 97.6 Write 85.7 Mixed 51.9 SusWrite 28 48% 65.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.6 118% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 36.1% Great: 43%
WD My Book 1230 4TB 14,665 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 214GB free, PID 1230 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 22 23 24 22 21 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	20.6% Poor	Read 99.6 Write 101 Mixed 45.4 SusWrite 23.1 85% 67.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.4 27% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 20.6% Great: 60%
WD My Book 1140 4TB 1,831 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 698GB free, PID 1140 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 106 107 108 105 108 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	36.6% Below average	Read 81.9 Write 66.9 Mixed 19.1 SusWrite 106 91% 68.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.2 26% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 36.6% Great: 50%
WD My Book 1230 4TB 14,665 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1TB free, PID 1230 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 148 148 149 147 146 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	59.5% Above average	Read 147 Write 94.9 Mixed 80.4 SusWrite 146 154% 117 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 1 105% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 59.5% Great: 60%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB-$42 131,007 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	83.1% Excellent	MC Read 32.9 MC Write 30.7 MC Mixed 23 82% 28.9 GB/s	SC Read 20.4 SC Write 32 SC Mixed 27.5 76% 26.6 GB/s	Latency 55.4 72% 55.4 ns
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 83.1% Great: 95%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF H370-PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 515 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 53%

Yacht

Desktop 90%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 49%

Yacht

Motherboard: Asus TUF H370-PRO GAMING

CPU
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	127x
Core i5-8400Intel $129Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	80x
Core i5-9400FIntel $98Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	64x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	52x
RTX 2060Nvidia $296Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	39x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	26x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	28x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	17x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	17x

RAM
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	23x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 77%, 131,007 samples	15x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $397

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16