MSI Z370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7B45)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics86% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B45
MotherboardMSI Z370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7B45)  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171214
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 28 '19 at 23:58
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8600K-$125
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Memory 96.2
1-Core 154
2-Core 312
102% 187 Pts
4-Core 622
8-Core 780
90% 701 Pts
64-Core 865
54% 865 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 104%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
Gigabyte(1458 3772) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 417.71
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
86% Excellent
Lighting 108
Reflection 114
Parallax 98
88% 107 fps
MRender 96.9
Gravity 99.7
Splatting 101
81% 99.1 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 86%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 503
Write 487
Mixed 394
103% 461 MB/s
4K Read 46
4K Write 140
4K Mixed 65
227% 83.6 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 360
271% 362 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
68GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 490 490 326 314 316 317 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
137% Outstanding
Read 514
Write 492
Mixed 463
SusWrite 376
104% 461 MB/s
4K Read 52.4
4K Write 147
4K Mixed 72.6
250% 90.6 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 358
270% 361 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 137%
Great: 128%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 268GB
241GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 490 490 391 286 289 288 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
138% Outstanding
Read 520
Write 492
Mixed 471
SusWrite 372
104% 464 MB/s
4K Read 53.7
4K Write 145
4K Mixed 72.9
252% 90.6 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 361
272% 364 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 138%
Great: 126%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
548GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 140 142 141 143 143 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
86.1% Excellent
Read 158
Write 93.5
Mixed 89.3
SusWrite 142
89% 121 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.2
251% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 109%
SanDisk Ultra Flair USB 3.0 16GB-$7
3GB free, PID 5591
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 13 10 9.8 10 9.9 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
28.7% Poor
Read 114
Write 39.7
Mixed 59.3
SusWrite 15.3
65% 57.2 MB/s
4K Read 5.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 3.7
229% 4 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB-$63
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
97.6% Outstanding
MC Read 39.1
MC Write 37.4
MC Mixed 27.4
99% 34.6 GB/s
SC Read 22.2
SC Write 35.2
SC Mixed 30.1
83% 29.2 GB/s
Latency 53.1
75% 53.1 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 97.6%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7B45) Builds (Compare 3,989 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI Z370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7B45) - $206

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $1,022
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback