Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 56% Gunboat	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 48% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	89.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	81.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	29.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	3808 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140408
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 27 '19 at 22:24
Run Duration	226 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.35 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	61.5% Good	Memory 79.4 1-Core 75.2 2-Core 141 60% 98.4 Pts	4-Core 236 8-Core 463 41% 350 Pts	64-Core 465 29% 465 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 61.5% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200 478,117 User benchmarks, average bench 104% MSI(1462 3731) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 417.71 Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	89.8% Excellent	Lighting 103 Reflection 105 Parallax 91.5 84% 99.8 fps	MRender 167 Gravity 118 Splatting 97.2 101% 127 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 89.8% Great: 112%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba HG6 256GB 4,588 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 152GB free (System drive) Firmware: JURA0101 SusWrite @10s intervals: 359 346 139 121 143 165 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	81.9% Excellent	Read 484 Write 436 Mixed 435 SusWrite 212 88% 392 MB/s	4K Read 23.7 4K Write 67 4K Mixed 38.6 121% 43.1 MB/s	DQ Read 282 DQ Write 236 DQ Mixed 255 192% 257 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 81.9% Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 91GB free Firmware: CC93 SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 117 104 103 103 102 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	71.6% Very good	Read 143 Write 134 Mixed 37.3 SusWrite 107 76% 105 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.3 80% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 71.6% Great: 112%
Samsung HD103SI 1TB-$89 48,059 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 41GB free Firmware: 1AG01118 SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 68 70 69 70 70 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	37% Below average	Read 59 Write 66 Mixed 44.8 SusWrite 69.5 44% 59.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.8 146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 37% Great: 59%
Seagate BUP BL 5TB 69 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 7GB free, PID ab30 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 64 65 61 63 62 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	34.8% Below average	Read 45.2 Write 66.5 Mixed 63.3 SusWrite 62.7 85% 59.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 4.7 4K Mixed 0.5 179% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 34.8% Great: 55%
PNY USB 2.0 FD 16GB 20 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 4GB free, PID 004b Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.8 8.3 9 9.5 9.1 9.1 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	5.67% Terrible	Read 18.2 Write 4.3 Mixed 13.3 SusWrite 8.8 14% 11.1 MB/s	4K Read 4.7 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 17% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.67% Great: 6%
Samsung Flash Drive DUO 128GB 597 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 105GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	11.3% Very poor	Read 30.7 Write 21.5 Mixed 29.5 SusWrite 14 31% 23.9 MB/s	4K Read 3.1 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 1.5 96% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 11.3% Great: 48%
Samsung Flash Drive 32GB 12,134 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 24GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.8 14 14 13 13 14 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	8.2% Terrible	Read 30.8 Write 16 Mixed 19.5 SusWrite 12.8 24% 19.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0 12% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 8.2% Great: 86%
Generic External 1TB 830 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 27GB free, PID 3920 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 70 68 69 70 70 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	30% Poor	Read 71.8 Write 66.8 Mixed 19.3 SusWrite 69.4 74% 56.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.6 70% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 30% Great: 63%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1600 CL10 Series 1866EL Series 1600 CL10 Series 1866EL Series 32GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	39.7% Below average	MC Read 14.6 MC Write 14 MC Mixed 12.8 39% 13.8 GB/s	SC Read 9.2 SC Write 10.1 SC Mixed 11.6 29% 10.3 GB/s	Latency 81.7 49% 81.7 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 39.7% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,678 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0 - $200

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	866x
FX-9590AMD $298Bench 63%, 26,109 samples	209x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	146x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	111x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	83x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	81x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	62x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	61x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	59x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	84x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x8GBKingstonBench 63%, 12,722 samples	45x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	29x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 53% - Above average

Total price: $630

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16