Asus X200CA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.48% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus X200CA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X200CA
Memory1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130918
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 25 '19 at 18:15
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron 1007U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
43.3% Average
Memory 80.1
1-Core 37.6
2-Core 40.6
40% 52.8 Pts
4-Core 43.1
8-Core 40.1
6% 41.6 Pts
64-Core 52.1
3% 52.1 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Asus(1043 138D) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5059
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
1.48% Terrible
Lighting 1.53
Reflection 1.54
Parallax 1.22
1% 1.43 fps
MRender 2.67
Gravity 1
Splatting 3.13
2% 2.27 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.48%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS545050A7E680 500GB
362GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GG2OAF10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 65 58 75 73 73 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
43.4% Average
Read 82.3
Write 58.2
Mixed 30.2
SusWrite 68.9
44% 59.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
109% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 58%
SDHC Card 8GB
7GB free, PID 6366
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.4 6.5 6.5 6.6 6.6 6.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
3.42% Terrible
Read 9.7
Write 5.7
Mixed 2.7
SusWrite 6.4
8% 6.12 MB/s
4K Read 2.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
10% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.42%
Great: 12%
Kingston DataTraveler Ultimate USB 3.0 16GB-$44
4GB free, PID 1656
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 23 24 24 23 22 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
11.1% Very poor
Read 24.1
Write 20.6
Mixed 11
SusWrite 22.8
26% 19.6 MB/s
4K Read 3.2
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.8
60% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 11.1%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EDJ4216EFBG-GNL-F 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
27.5% Poor
MC Read 9.3
MC Write 8.4
MC Mixed 8.8
25% 8.83 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 8.5
23% 8.13 GB/s
Latency 80.3
50% 80.3 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 27.5%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X200CA Builds (Compare 76 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X200CA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback