Asus M4A89GTD-PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 55% Gunboat	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	31.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 years ago, 6 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus M4A89GTD-PRO (all builds)
Memory	8.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20120705
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 25 '19 at 08:07
Run Duration	119 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-6300-$90 261,607 User benchmarks, average bench 55% AM3, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	50.8% Above average	Memory 70.8 1-Core 52.2 2-Core 79 44% 67.3 Pts	4-Core 169 8-Core 271 27% 220 Pts	64-Core 268 17% 268 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 50.8% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 680-$360 38,995 User benchmarks, average bench 32% Nvidia(10DE 0969) 2GB CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing below potential (54^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	31.1% Below average	Lighting 37.2 Reflection 35 Parallax 47.5 30% 39.9 fps	MRender 47.4 Gravity 42.2 Splatting 32.9 33% 40.8 fps
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 31.1% Great: 35%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD WD5000AAKB-00H8A0 500GB 1,191 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 203GB free (System drive) Firmware: 500. SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 71 71 75 75 75 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	40.8% Average	Read 73.5 Write 68.9 Mixed 44.3 SusWrite 68.4 47% 63.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1 176% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 40.8% Great: 46%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50 170,877 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 279GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 73 74 73 73 74 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	54.3% Above average	Read 116 Write 110 Mixed 75 SusWrite 73.3 69% 93.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1 193% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 54.3% Great: 84%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905403-174.A00LF Corsair CMV4GX3M1A1333C9 9905403-174.A00LF CT102464BD160B.M16 16GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1600 MHz 2048, 4096, 2048, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	35.9% Below average	MC Read 12.5 MC Write 11.7 MC Mixed 13.7 36% 12.6 GB/s	SC Read 9.2 SC Write 8 SC Mixed 10.8 27% 9.33 GB/s	Latency 99.6 40% 99.6 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 35.9% Great: 40%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M4A89GTD-PRO Builds (Compare 61 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M4A89GTD-PRO

CPU
Phenom II X6 1055TAMD $175Bench 54%, 23,835 samples	7x
Phenom II X6 1090TAMD $240Bench 57%, 23,506 samples	7x
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	7x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	4x
HD 6870AMDBench 15%, 25,443 samples	3x
Radeon HD 4290ATIBench 1%, 1,024 samples	3x

SSD
Green 240GB (2018)WD $36Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	6x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	5x
Solid State Disk 128GBSpccBench 69%, 14,793 samples	3x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	3x
CT51264BA160BJ.C8F CT51264BA160BJ.C8F 8GBUnknownBench 35%, 350 samples	2x
Team-Elite-1333 Team-Elite-1333 16GBUnknownBench 41%, 48 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $270

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16