Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Graphics	7.75% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	28.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Very high background CPU (84%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

9 years ago, 9 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 6700-$230 2,388 User benchmarks, average bench 39% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		1-Core 31.8 2-Core 67.2 22% 49.5 Pts	4-Core 65 8-Core 64.3 9% 64.7 Pts	64-Core 65.4 4% 65.4 Pts
Poor: 28% Great: 44%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI HD 4870 22,563 User benchmarks, average bench 9% Asus(1043 031E) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.97.10.6 Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	7.75% Terrible	Lighting 10 Reflection 8.08 Parallax 6.66 8% 8.26 fps	MRender 6.62 Gravity 6.23 Splatting 11.3 7% 8.04 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 7.75% Great: 12%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Agility 3 240GB-$199 10,165 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 118GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	28.9% Poor	Read 115 Write 89.5 Mixed 79.4 21% 94.6 MB/s	4K Read 20 4K Write 38.5 4K Mixed 8.09 61% 22.2 MB/s	DQ Read 19.2 DQ Write 42.3 DQ Mixed 9.15 13% 23.5 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 28.9% Great: 66%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139 139,542 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 634GB free Firmware: 80.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	54.1% Above average	Read 101 Write 86.9 Mixed 86.1 69% 91.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.71 4K Write 1.46 4K Mixed 0.12 70% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 54.1% Great: 59%
TOSHIBA MQ01ABF050 500GB 56 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 232GB free, PID 70f5 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	17.1% Very poor	Read 34 Write 33.1 Mixed 34 44% 33.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.32 4K Write 1.59 4K Mixed 0.18 62% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 17.1% Great: 40%

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 15%

Surfboard

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples	6x
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples	5x
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples	4x

Value: 39% - Below average

Total price: $396

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16