| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 6.37% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | 57.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
| System | Fujitsu CELSIUS H910 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | FUJITSU FJNB220 |
| Memory | 8.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20120314 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 21 '19 at 17:52 |
| Run Duration | 128 Seconds |
| Run User | CZE-User |
| Background CPU | 5% |
PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
66%
Good
|
65% 109 Pts
|
41% 330 Pts
|
25% 410 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia Quadro 3000M
Fujitsu(10CF 1633) 2GB
CLim: 450 MHz, MLim: 625 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 377.83
|
6.37%
Terrible
|
6% 7.37 fps
|
7% 8.82 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Patriot Burst 240GB
129GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM
SusWrite @10s intervals: 362 78 67 67 67 68 MB/s
|
57.6%
Above average
|
60% 266 MB/s
|
87% 29 MB/s
|
140% 206 MB/s
|
|
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$56
794GB free
Firmware: AX00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 117 117 116 117 116 MB/s
|
56.4%
Above average
|
61% 84.5 MB/s
|
86% 0.67 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
39.6%
Below average
|
37% 13 GB/s
|
38% 13.3 GB/s
|
53% 74.9 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical CELSIUS H910 Builds (Compare 15 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Fujitsu CELSIUS H910
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-2860QMIntel $469Bench 62%, 4,317 samples | 4x |
| Core i7-2920XMIntelBench 62%, 906 samples | 4x |
| Core i7-2640MIntelBench 54%, 12,152 samples | 2x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Quadro 3000MNvidiaBench 6%, 2,560 samples | 8x |
| Quadro 4000MNvidiaBench 8%, 1,114 samples | 5x |
| Quadro 5010MNvidiaBench 10%, 111 samples | 1x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 53% - Above average | Total price: $469 |