Asus Q505UAR

Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	6.52% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 88% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Asus Q505UAR (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK Q505UAR
Memory	8.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170912
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Jan 21 '19 at 07:46
Run Duration	135 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	14%
CPU Throttled	88%

PC Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8250U 234,942 User benchmarks, average bench 53% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	70.7% Very good	Memory 85.1 1-Core 95.9 2-Core 166 69% 116 Pts	4-Core 313 8-Core 402 46% 357 Pts	64-Core 411 25% 411 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 70.7% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R) 420,154 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 1B00) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6286 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	6.52% Terrible	Lighting 6.7 Reflection 9.19 Parallax 7.59 6% 7.83 fps	MRender 9.71 Gravity 6.3 Splatting 14 9% 10 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.52% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 250GB 26,055 User benchmarks, average bench 100% 135GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT21B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 331 318 288 283 279 280 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	105% Outstanding	Read 504 Write 475 Mixed 452 SusWrite 296 97% 432 MB/s	4K Read 38.4 4K Write 75.3 4K Mixed 49.2 161% 54.3 MB/s	DQ Read 383 DQ Write 335 DQ Mixed 354 266% 357 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 126%
Hitachi HTS541010B7E610 1TB 40,802 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 930GB free Firmware: 03.01A03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 117 119 117 119 118 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	86.8% Excellent	Read 195 Write 24.7 Mixed 55.7 SusWrite 107 70% 95.6 MB/s	4K Read 1.6 4K Write 3.1 4K Mixed 0.9 224% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 86.8% Great: 72%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G3H1 Hynix HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 12GB 309 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	57.4% Above average	MC Read 22.1 MC Write 21.2 MC Mixed 16.1 57% 19.8 GB/s	SC Read 13.9 SC Write 21 SC Mixed 19.1 51% 18 GB/s	Latency 71.9 56% 71.9 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 57.4% Great: 68%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Q505UAR Builds (Compare 104 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 53%

Yacht

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

System: Asus Q505UAR

CPU
Core i5-8250UIntelBench 53%, 234,942 samples	104x

GPU
UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)IntelBench 5%, 420,154 samples	99x
GTX 950Nvidia $100Bench 26%, 111,509 samples	3x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	1x

SSD
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GBBench 72%, 50,765 samples	11x
MX500 1TBCrucial $74Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	5x
CS900 500GB SSDPNYBench 75%, 16,267 samples	5x

RAM
8ATF1G64HZ-2G3H1 Hynix HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 12GBMicronBench 55%, 309 samples	49x
8ATF1G64HZ-2G3H1 Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC 12GBMicronBench 53%, 137 samples	32x
8ATF1G64HZ-2G3H1 1x8GBMicronBench 38%, 2,683 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16