Supermicro X9SRE/X9SRE-3F/X9SRi/X9SRi-3F

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics24.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive59% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemSupermicro X9SRE/X9SRE-3F/X9SRi/X9SRi-3F  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X9SRE/X9SRE-3F/X9SRi/X9SRi-3F
Memory57.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150831
Uptime1 Days
Run DateJul 22 '16 at 00:37
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1650 0-$230
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
66.3% Good
Memory 74.6
1-Core 64.7
2-Core 168
59% 102 Pts
4-Core 313
8-Core 520
51% 416 Pts
64-Core 714
44% 714 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 580-$450
Gigabyte(1458 350F) 1.5GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6822
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
24.9% Poor
Lighting 29.3
Reflection 44.6
Parallax 32.6
24% 35.5 fps
MRender 43.8
Gravity 22.7
Splatting 32.8
27% 33.1 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 24.9%
Great: 24%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDSC2BB48 480GB
201GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0370 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
59% Above average
Read 266
Write 248
Mixed 255
57% 256 MB/s
4K Read 22.8
4K Write 41.2
4K Mixed 22.4
85% 28.8 MB/s
DQ Read 177
DQ Write 147
DQ Mixed 98.8
91% 141 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 59%
Great: 100%
Hitachi HUA5C303 3TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: A580 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51.9% Above average
Read 90.8
Write 89.9
Mixed 75.3
64% 85.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.59
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.33
87% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 55%
Toshiba MK2002TS 2TB
710GB free
Firmware: MT2A Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
74.5% Very good
Read 137
Write 122
Mixed 142
101% 134 MB/s
4K Read 0.83
4K Write 1.67
4K Mixed 0.36
106% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 82%
Toshiba MK2002TS 2TB
190GB free
Firmware: MT2A Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
52.1% Above average
Read 81.8
Write 99.3
Mixed 107
73% 96.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.01
4K Write 1.74
4K Mixed 0.37
115% 1.04 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B2G70QH0-CMA 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
95.7% Outstanding
MC Read 41.7
MC Write 39.2
MC Mixed 36.7
112% 39.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 8
25% 8.73 GB/s
Latency 91.1
44% 91.1 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 95.7%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X9SRE/X9SRE-3F/X9SRi/X9SRi-3F Builds (Compare 33 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: Supermicro X9SRE/X9SRE-3F/X9SRi/X9SRi-3F

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $257
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback