Gigabyte B450 AORUS M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics15.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte B450 AORUS M  (all builds)
Memory3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181224
Uptime2.3 Days
Run DateJan 19 '19 at 23:43
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G-$135
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
71.8% Very good
Memory 82.6
1-Core 117
2-Core 170
73% 123 Pts
4-Core 329
8-Core 618
56% 474 Pts
64-Core 626
39% 626 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 11 (Ryzen iGPU)
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.1.1
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
15.2% Very poor
Lighting 18.9
Reflection 15.5
Parallax 27
15% 20.5 fps
MRender 8.24
Gravity 22.5
Splatting 21
15% 17.2 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 15.2%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GB
137GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UJ450000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 2.7 14 44 178 69 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
50.5% Above average
Read 448
Write 310
Mixed 312
SusWrite 78.4
64% 287 MB/s
4K Read 21.6
4K Write 39.4
4K Mixed 18.1
77% 26.4 MB/s
DQ Read 117
DQ Write 88.2
DQ Mixed 39.6
47% 81.7 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 55%
Fujitsu MJA2500BH G2 500GB
464GB free
Firmware: 8919
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 78 82 84 84 83 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
47.8% Average
Read 85
Write 77.3
Mixed 43.8
SusWrite 81.5
53% 71.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
106% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 3000 2OZ 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
50.6% Above average
MC Read 19.1
MC Write 16.2
MC Mixed 14.9
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 19.8
SC Mixed 17.5
53% 18.7 GB/s
Latency 75.8
53% 75.8 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B450 AORUS M Builds (Compare 8,036 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte B450 AORUS M - $149

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $433
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback