Gigabyte GA-P75-D3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics33.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive70.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-P75-D3  (all builds)
Memory28.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121121
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateJan 19 '19 at 20:59
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770K CPU @ 3.50GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
78.5% Very good
Memory 91.3
1-Core 108
2-Core 215
79% 138 Pts
4-Core 356
8-Core 512
54% 434 Pts
64-Core 519
32% 519 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 2088 MHz, MLim: 1847 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 417.71
Performing below potential (99th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (41 fps cap detected)
33.6% Below average
Lighting 41.7
Reflection 33.5
Parallax 39.9
34% 38.4 fps
MRender 40.9
Gravity 41.1
Splatting 38.8
33% 40.2 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX100 250GB-$141
143GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 336 322 351 350 242 185 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
70.2% Very good
Read 371
Write 339
Mixed 270
SusWrite 298
72% 319 MB/s
4K Read 23.7
4K Write 61.7
4K Mixed 31.8
109% 39.1 MB/s
DQ Read 29.9
DQ Write 109
DQ Mixed 42.1
40% 60.4 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 103%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$25
411GB free
Firmware: CC35
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 127 127 127 127 127 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
71.6% Very good
Read 123
Write 130
Mixed 60.8
SusWrite 127
80% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
174% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 70%
WDC WD10 01FALS-40U9B0 1TB
651GB free, PID 2351
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.8 5 4.7 4.8 4.7 4.9 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
15.1% Very poor
Read 38.1
Write 40.2
Mixed 34.9
SusWrite 4.8
38% 29.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.9
125% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 15%
WDC WD10 01FALS-75J7B0 1TB
893GB free, PID 2351
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 37 38 38 38 37 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
21.7% Poor
Read 36.9
Write 39.3
Mixed 33.1
SusWrite 37.4
50% 36.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
122% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 21.7%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C10 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
50.5% Above average
MC Read 18
MC Write 17.1
MC Mixed 15.4
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 17.7
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 65.2
61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-P75-D3 Builds (Compare 464 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-P75-D3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $384
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $136
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback