HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx

Performance Results


Gaming 38% Jet ski	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 35% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	42.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	95.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 84FD
Memory	8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180807
Uptime	4.3 Days
Run Date	Jan 19 '19 at 04:34
Run Duration	122 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	18%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700-$200 349,567 User benchmarks, average bench 87% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	84.2% Excellent	Memory 84.4 1-Core 121 2-Core 242 83% 149 Pts	4-Core 451 8-Core 721 72% 586 Pts	64-Core 943 58% 943 Pts
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 84.2% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% HP(103C 82FC) 3GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 417.1 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	42.7% Average	Lighting 52.3 Reflection 53.5 Parallax 45.7 43% 50.5 fps	MRender 54.3 Gravity 51 Splatting 52 43% 52.4 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 42.7% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kbg30zmv256g TOSHIBA 256GB 31,797 User benchmarks, average bench 99% 8GB free (System drive) Firmware: ADHA0101 SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 84 88 132 119 72 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	95.1% Outstanding	Read 786 Write 131 Mixed 232 SusWrite 116 68% 316 MB/s	4K Read 38.1 4K Write 77.1 4K Mixed 26.8 133% 47.3 MB/s	DQ Read 645 DQ Write 128 DQ Mixed 75.7 136% 283 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 95.1% Great: 147%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 787GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 175 175 174 177 177 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	Read 181 Write 175 Mixed 99.5 SusWrite 175 116% 158 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1.1 224% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HP26D4U6D8ME-16X 1x16GB 4,169 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	41.2% Average	MC Read 15 MC Write 14.7 MC Mixed 12.2 40% 14 GB/s	SC Read 11.1 SC Write 12 SC Mixed 12.2 34% 11.8 GB/s	Latency 72.8 55% 72.8 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 41.2% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx Builds (Compare 6,094 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 67%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 88%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 60%

Destroyer

System: HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx

CPU
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	2,387x
Core i7-9700Intel $250Bench 92%, 79,875 samples	2,014x
Core i5-9400FIntel $95Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	715x

GPU
GTX 1660-TiNvidia $143Bench 76%, 318,562 samples	1,331x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	830x
RTX 2060Nvidia $296Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	714x

SSD
TOSHIBA 256GBKbg30zmv256gBench 99%, 31,797 samples	1,401x
hynix BC501 HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GBSKBench 123%, 30,266 samples	1,229x
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1006 256GBWDCBench 152%, 17,295 samples	295x

RAM
HP26D4U9D8ME-16X 1x16GBKingstonBench 46%, 8,406 samples	1,899x
HP26D4U6D8ME-16X 1x16GBKingstonBench 47%, 4,169 samples	780x
HP26D4U9S8ME-8X 2x8GBKingstonBench 79%, 4,094 samples	453x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 108% - Outstanding

Total price: $343

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16