PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 5.99% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
Boot Drive | 43.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asus P5E (all builds) |
Memory | 4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren, |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20090219 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jul 21 '16 at 00:13 |
Run Duration | 251 Seconds |
Run User | NLD-User |
Background CPU | 24% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
49.4%
Average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R7 250
Sapphire(174B E269) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 16.200.1035.1001
|
5.99%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
|
21.1%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 22x |
Core2 Quad Q9400Intel $170Bench 46%, 24,176 samples | 12x |
Xeon E3110Intel $200Bench 42%, 372 samples | 12x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 660Nvidia $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples | 14x |
GTX 650Nvidia $112Bench 8%, 69,673 samples | 7x |
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 5x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 38% - Below average | Total price: $270 |