Gigabyte GA-B450 AORUS ELITE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive181% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (52%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B450 AORUS ELITE  (all builds)
Memory9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180808
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 18 '19 at 22:30
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 52%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700-$185
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
56.1% Above average
Memory 49.5
1-Core 100
2-Core 192
61% 114 Pts
4-Core 336
8-Core 588
56% 462 Pts
64-Core 962
60% 962 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 83%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
XPG Gammix S11 NVMe PCIe M.2 240GB
194GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVN139B Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 816 808 832 812 815 846 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
181% Outstanding
Read 1,069
Write 755
Mixed 794
SusWrite 822
193% 860 MB/s
4K Read 42
4K Write 85.8
4K Mixed 56
181% 61.3 MB/s
DQ Read 790
DQ Write 618
DQ Mixed 614
484% 674 MB/s
Poor: 110%
This bench: 181%
Great: 258%
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89
223GB free
Firmware: 0C3J96R9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 357 133 95 91 88 89 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
65% Good
Read 386
Write 411
Mixed 310
SusWrite 142
70% 312 MB/s
4K Read 21.7
4K Write 49.5
4K Mixed 28.8
96% 33.3 MB/s
DQ Read 242
DQ Write 251
DQ Mixed 166
147% 219 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 65%
Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
911GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 197 201 201 199 200 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 208
Write 186
Mixed 98
SusWrite 198
126% 172 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 116%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CL16-18-18 D4-3000 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
48.8% Average
MC Read 19.6
MC Write 17.1
MC Mixed 20.7
55% 19.1 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 9.2
SC Mixed 8.4
23% 8.17 GB/s
Latency 163
25% 163 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 100%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B450 AORUS ELITE Builds (Compare 11,162 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B450 AORUS ELITE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $422
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback