HP 221C____

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics2.84% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive69.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemHP 221C____  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 221C
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20150722
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJan 18 '19 at 04:26
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8 PRO-7150B R5, 10 Compute Cores 4C+6G
Socket FS1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
29% Poor
Memory 39.9
1-Core 34.4
2-Core 65.8
29% 46.7 Pts
4-Core 107
8-Core 97.4
14% 102 Pts
64-Core 108
7% 108 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 29%
Great: 37%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
HP(103C 221C) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 16.11.5
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
2.84% Terrible
Lighting 3.2
Reflection 3.73
Parallax 3.94
3% 3.62 fps
MRender 3.86
Gravity 2.73
Splatting 5.04
3% 3.88 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.84%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$190
405GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 284 291 289 293 292 292 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
69.9% Good
Read 424
Write 291
Mixed 294
SusWrite 290
73% 325 MB/s
4K Read 20.6
4K Write 48.3
4K Mixed 23.9
87% 30.9 MB/s
DQ Read 211
DQ Write 166
DQ Mixed 185
139% 187 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 124%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73QH0-YK0 0702 1GX64V160K 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
23.6% Poor
MC Read 11.1
MC Write 4.9
MC Mixed 9.9
25% 8.63 GB/s
SC Read 5.4
SC Write 4.5
SC Mixed 6.9
16% 5.6 GB/s
Latency 203
20% 203 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $289Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback