Asus AM1I-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 17%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 13.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics2.47% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (82%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus AM1I-A  (all builds)
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1280 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140313
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateJan 18 '19 at 03:05
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 82%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 5350 APU R3
FS1b , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.05 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
13.5% Very poor
Memory 11.9
1-Core 25.4
2-Core 49
15% 28.8 Pts
4-Core 85.2
8-Core 93.9
12% 89.6 Pts
64-Core 94
6% 94 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8400-R3
Asus(1043 8623) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 17.7
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
2.47% Terrible
Lighting 2.03
Reflection 4.15
Parallax 3.06
2% 3.08 fps
MRender 5.48
Gravity 2.93
Splatting 6.04
4% 4.82 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.47%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 315 150 149 148 115 101 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
53% Above average
Read 306
Write 280
Mixed 263
SusWrite 163
57% 253 MB/s
4K Read 18.2
4K Write 29.6
4K Mixed 21.5
71% 23.1 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 191
145% 195 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 53%
Great: 115%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
462GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 115 117 117 117 116 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
82% Excellent
Read 170
Write 124
Mixed 91.8
SusWrite 116
92% 125 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.1
199% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 82%
Great: 109%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 167 171 170 171 172 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
96.8% Outstanding
Read 167
Write 138
Mixed 69.5
SusWrite 170
99% 136 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
193% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 96.8%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16GB
800, 800 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance (0th percentile)
12.1% Very poor
MC Read 5.2
MC Write 3.5
MC Mixed 4.7
13% 4.47 GB/s
SC Read 2.7
SC Write 2
SC Mixed 3.1
7% 2.6 GB/s
Latency 387
10% 387 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 12.1%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical AM1I-A Builds (Compare 32 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus AM1I-A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 9% - Terrible Total price: $36
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback