Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5

Performance Results


Gaming 104% UFO	Desktop 93% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 95% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	111% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	113% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 (all builds)
Memory	13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181225
Uptime	0.7 Days
Run Date	Jan 18 '19 at 02:00
Run Duration	177 Seconds
Run User	CHL-User
Background CPU	11%

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X-$120 142,983 User benchmarks, average bench 74% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	91% Outstanding	Memory 90.1 1-Core 126 2-Core 253 87% 156 Pts	4-Core 495 8-Core 808 80% 651 Pts	64-Core 1,011 62% 1,011 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 91% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Asus(1043 85F1) CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 417.71 Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	111% Outstanding	Lighting 145 Reflection 173 Parallax 160 118% 159 fps	MRender 117 Gravity 147 Splatting 117 103% 127 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 111% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
CT250MX500SSD4 250GB 16,301 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 185GB free (System drive) Firmware: M3CR020 SusWrite @10s intervals: 456 457 332 320 244 191 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	113% Outstanding	Read 500 Write 457 Mixed 442 SusWrite 333 97% 433 MB/s	4K Read 37.8 4K Write 98.6 4K Mixed 55.5 181% 64 MB/s	DQ Read 380 DQ Write 353 DQ Mixed 278 233% 337 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 113% Great: 121%
HyperX Savage 240GB-$120 39,518 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 56GB free Firmware: SAFM00.r SusWrite @10s intervals: 477 480 267 261 176 151 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	97.9% Outstanding	Read 499 Write 477 Mixed 311 SusWrite 302 89% 397 MB/s	4K Read 29.7 4K Write 89.1 4K Mixed 38.7 142% 52.5 MB/s	DQ Read 360 DQ Write 352 DQ Mixed 68.3 130% 260 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 97.9% Great: 111%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 71GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 94 94 95 95 94 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	61.5% Good	Read 120 Write 95.2 Mixed 67 SusWrite 94.2 69% 94 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1.1 226% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 61.5% Great: 109%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$107 47,617 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 60GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 120 118 121 90 122 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	53.9% Above average	Read 77.9 Write 79.4 Mixed 84.9 SusWrite 110 65% 88 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1 204% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 53.9% Great: 85%
ADATA SP 900 128GB 23GB free, PID 601a Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 108 97 101 103 84 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	129% Outstanding	Read 175 Write 124 Mixed 128 SusWrite 100 170% 132 MB/s	4K Read 12.4 4K Write 25.7 4K Mixed 18.1 1,536% 18.7 MB/s	DQ Read 16.6 DQ Write 35.4 DQ Mixed 20.8 1,973% 24.3 MB/s

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata DDR4 3200 2x8GB 87,891 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	114% Outstanding	MC Read 45.6 MC Write 41.4 MC Mixed 37 118% 41.3 GB/s	SC Read 28.1 SC Write 41.9 SC Mixed 31.9 97% 34 GB/s	Latency 67.2 60% 67.2 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 114% Great: 112%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming 5 Builds (Compare 678 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 90%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 80%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 87%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 - $246

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	100x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $211Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	88x
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	75x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	70x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	52x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	49x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	27x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	23x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	17x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	37x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	23x
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $1,064

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 - $246

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)