Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.84% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N3060 20,242 User benchmarks, average bench 18% CHV, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	26.9% Poor	Memory 47.8 1-Core 24.2 2-Core 47.4 27% 39.8 Pts	4-Core 36 8-Core 42.8 5% 39.4 Pts	64-Core 41.7 3% 41.7 Pts
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 26.9% Great: 28%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 60,712 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Acer(1025 1151) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4474 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.84% Terrible	Lighting 1.8 Reflection 3.12 Parallax 2.41 2% 2.44 fps	MRender 3.1 Gravity 1.67 Splatting 4.22 2% 2.99 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.84% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Kingston DataTraveler SE9 8GB 1,239 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 2GB free, PID 1689 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.9 2.3 2.9 3.2 2.7 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	3.63% Terrible	Read 15.8 Write 14.8 Mixed 9 SusWrite 2.9 13% 10.6 MB/s	4K Read 3 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 11% 1 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 3.63% Great: 6%
SanDisk Ultra Fit 123GB 3,622 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 98GB free, PID 5583 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 34 38 43 55 34 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	30.8% Below average	Read 132 Write 34.1 Mixed 37.9 SusWrite 40.3 67% 61.1 MB/s	4K Read 4.3 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 2.1 108% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 30.8% Great: 37%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix H5TC4G63CFR-PBA 2x2GB 295 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (18^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	16.8% Very poor	MC Read 5.2 MC Write 7 MC Mixed 5.4 17% 5.87 GB/s	SC Read 3 SC Write 4.8 SC Mixed 3.8 11% 3.87 GB/s	Latency 169 24% 169 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 16.8% Great: 32%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16