Acer Aspire V5-573G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics8.57% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive35.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 69% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire V5-573G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Dazzle_HW
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150112
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 16 '19 at 16:47
Run Duration227 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU1%
CPU Throttled 69%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4200U-$281
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
57.3% Above average
Memory 84.2
1-Core 71.4
2-Core 125
58% 93.5 Pts
4-Core 180
8-Core 173
24% 177 Pts
64-Core 181
11% 181 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 750M
Acer(1025 079B) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 21.21.13.7654
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
8.57% Terrible
Lighting 10.3
Reflection 9.04
Parallax 11.1
8% 10.2 fps
MRender 8.81
Gravity 12.6
Splatting 10.9
9% 10.7 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.57%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 120GB
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFMB1.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 34 69 110 60 132 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
35.5% Below average
Read 281
Write 101
Mixed 116
SusWrite 81.7
32% 145 MB/s
4K Read 17
4K Write 28.3
4K Mixed 13.3
58% 19.5 MB/s
DQ Read 40.8
DQ Write 42.6
DQ Mixed 34.7
28% 39.4 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 94%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$55
679GB free
Firmware: AX003J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 72 72 71 69 72 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
40.7% Average
Read 70.8
Write 69
Mixed 28.3
SusWrite 71.1
44% 59.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
121% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451S6MFR6A-PB RMT3170ME68F9F1600 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
53.2% Above average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 20.8
MC Mixed 17.3
53% 18.6 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 13.9
SC Mixed 17.4
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 73.2
55% 73.2 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire V5-573G Builds (Compare 304 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire V5-573G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 39% - Below average Total price: $357
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback