Asus X555LAB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.65% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (52%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemAsus X555LAB  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X555LAB
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160727
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 16 '19 at 13:16
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User MLT-User
Background CPU 52%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5500U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
33.5% Below average
Memory 41.6
1-Core 18.1
2-Core 46.1
23% 35.3 Pts
4-Core 138
8-Core 225
22% 182 Pts
64-Core 244
15% 244 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
Asus(1043 19AD) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4549
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
2.65% Terrible
Lighting 2.67
Reflection 3.73
Parallax 3.69
2% 3.36 fps
MRender 4.33
Gravity 2.43
Splatting 5.83
4% 4.2 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.65%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SUV400S37A/240G 240GB
90GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0922A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 330 125 43 109 35 41 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
35.4% Below average
Read 393
Write 342
Mixed 338
SusWrite 114
66% 297 MB/s
4K Read 14.4
4K Write 11
4K Mixed 1.1
29% 8.83 MB/s
DQ Read 125
DQ Write 96
DQ Mixed 44.9
51% 88.7 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 59%
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 1TB
727GB free
Firmware: JA0OA560
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 69 73 72 72 72 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
43.5% Average
Read 81.5
Write 0.5
Mixed 29
SusWrite 69.8
33% 45.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
102% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8KTF51264HZ-1G6N1 Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
31.7% Below average
MC Read 10.1
MC Write 12.1
MC Mixed 14.4
35% 12.2 GB/s
SC Read 6.5
SC Write 4.2
SC Mixed 6.5
16% 5.73 GB/s
Latency 195
20% 195 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X555LAB Builds (Compare 816 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X555LAB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback