HP ProBook 430 G2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.07% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemHP ProBook 430 G2  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2246
Memory1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150623
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateJan 16 '19 at 13:06
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 28%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-5010U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
42.1% Average
Memory 62.8
1-Core 23.6
2-Core 36.6
30% 41 Pts
4-Core 118
8-Core 179
18% 148 Pts
64-Core 179
11% 179 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
HP(103C 2246) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5058
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
4.07% Terrible
Lighting 5.23
Reflection 3.31
Parallax 3.41
4% 3.98 fps
MRender 4.86
Gravity 2.47
Splatting 5.78
4% 4.37 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.07%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TE128HMGR-000H1 128GB
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT09H0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 74 49 24 23 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
36.2% Below average
Read 379
Write 44.7
Mixed 59
SusWrite 45.4
28% 132 MB/s
4K Read 11.1
4K Write 22.4
4K Mixed 13
45% 15.5 MB/s
DQ Read 149
DQ Write 41.7
DQ Mixed 37.9
43% 76.3 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
26.8% Poor
MC Read 10.2
MC Write 10.1
MC Mixed 8.6
28% 9.63 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 7
16% 5.5 GB/s
Latency 120
33% 120 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProBook 430 G2 Builds (Compare 75 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProBook 430 G2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 28% - Poor Total price: $76
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback