Asrock X470 Gaming-ITX/ac

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics16.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive115% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock X470 Gaming-ITX/ac  (all builds)
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180420
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 16 '19 at 00:11
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G-$135
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
79.8% Very good
Memory 87.7
1-Core 120
2-Core 195
78% 134 Pts
4-Core 387
8-Core 635
62% 511 Pts
64-Core 637
39% 637 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 11 (Ryzen iGPU)
AMD(1002 15DD) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 17.12
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
16.6% Very poor
Lighting 20.7
Reflection 18
Parallax 27.8
17% 22.2 fps
MRender 15.7
Gravity 21.8
Splatting 21
16% 19.5 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 16.6%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
420GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 422 437 388 452 461 447 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 464
Write 456
Mixed 356
SusWrite 435
96% 428 MB/s
4K Read 35.5
4K Write 90.8
4K Mixed 53.5
170% 59.9 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 355
DQ Mixed 367
276% 368 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 115%
Great: 134%
WD Red 6TB (2014)-$129
3.5TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 79 80 81 82 82 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
66.3% Good
Read 150
Write 143
Mixed 82
SusWrite 80.7
84% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
187% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 99%
ST2000DL 003-9VT166 2TB
1TB free, PID b157
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 33 33 32 32 33 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
15.7% Very poor
Read 37
Write 32
Mixed 25.5
SusWrite 32.5
42% 31.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
64% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$39
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
98.9% Outstanding
MC Read 35.7
MC Write 36.5
MC Mixed 32.9
100% 35 GB/s
SC Read 26.1
SC Write 43.3
SC Mixed 28.9
94% 32.8 GB/s
Latency 69.8
57% 69.8 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 98.9%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X470 Gaming-ITX/ac Builds (Compare 128 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 96%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 88%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock X470 Gaming-ITX/ac

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Good Total price: $802
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback