Fujitsu LIFEBOOK E754

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.48% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive81.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemFujitsu LIFEBOOK E754  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU FJNB270
Memory7.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170315
Uptime11.9 Days
Run DateJan 15 '19 at 08:54
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 51%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4300M-$264
Onboard, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
63.1% Good
Memory 84.4
1-Core 80
2-Core 142
62% 102 Pts
4-Core 245
8-Core 241
33% 243 Pts
64-Core 222
14% 222 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Fujitsu(10CF 17AA) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
3.48% Terrible
Lighting 3.87
Reflection 6.65
Parallax 6.16
3% 5.56 fps
MRender 4.19
Gravity 2.33
Splatting 7.57
4% 4.7 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.48%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 321 220 223 224 223 244 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
81.5% Excellent
Read 418
Write 320
Mixed 348
SusWrite 243
74% 332 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 46.8
4K Mixed 33.5
111% 36.2 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 326
DQ Mixed 350
262% 349 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 81.5%
Great: 124%
Seagate Laptop Thin SSHD 2.5" 500GB-$30
266GB free
Firmware: SM28
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 100 103 103 102 101 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
59.9% Above average
Read 108
Write 101
Mixed 56.5
SusWrite 101
67% 91.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
106% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5428-063.A00LF 99U5469-028.A00LF 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
31.9% Below average
MC Read 10.9
MC Write 11.1
MC Mixed 8.8
29% 10.3 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 10.9
SC Mixed 9.5
28% 9.8 GB/s
Latency 72.7
55% 72.7 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical LIFEBOOK E754 Builds (Compare 173 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu LIFEBOOK E754

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $264
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback