HP xw8600 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics41.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemHP xw8600 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0A98h
Memory11.5 GB free of 16.001 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120920
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJan 13 '19 at 22:01
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5450
XU1 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
48.4% Average
Memory 65.1
1-Core 38.1
2-Core 85.9
40% 63 Pts
4-Core 172
8-Core 336
30% 254 Pts
64-Core 340
21% 340 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 470-$126
CLim: 1228 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.1.1
Performing below potential (61st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
41.1% Average
Lighting 48
Reflection 62.6
Parallax 64.3
39% 58.3 fps
MRender 63.2
Gravity 49.6
Splatting 53.3
45% 55.4 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 500GB
391GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 124 122 126 126 125 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
47.7% Average
Read 133
Write 125
Mixed 129
SusWrite 122
29% 127 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 37.8
4K Mixed 30.3
98% 31.3 MB/s
DQ Read 101
DQ Write 88.9
DQ Mixed 95.2
71% 95.1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 118%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
255GB free
Firmware: RVT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 205 202 203 205 204 MB/s
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
74.9% Very good
Read 260
Write 248
Mixed 247
SusWrite 200
54% 239 MB/s
4K Read 34
4K Write 59.3
4K Mixed 43.1
138% 45.5 MB/s
DQ Read 205
DQ Write 194
DQ Mixed 198
149% 199 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 129%
DATA 8TB
702GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 222 238 227 257 245 253 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 36% Great: 136%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 49GB
null MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 33792 MB
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
20.4% Poor
MC Read 5.4
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 8.8
20% 6.9 GB/s
SC Read 2.9
SC Write 6.8
SC Mixed 4.2
13% 4.63 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 20.4%
Great: 22%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical xw8600 Workstation Builds (Compare 165 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP xw8600 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 43% - Average Total price: $165
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback