Lenovo 2928A95

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.33% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive27.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemLenovo 2928A95  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 2928A95
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120425
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 13 '19 at 20:13
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 M 520-$70
None, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
45.5% Average
Memory 64.8
1-Core 67.9
2-Core 120
51% 84.2 Pts
4-Core 155
8-Core 147
20% 151 Pts
64-Core 150
9% 150 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia NVS 3100M
Legend(17AA 21BE) 512MB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 8.16.11.9223
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.33% Terrible
Lighting 1.4
Reflection 2.81
Parallax 0.56
1% 1.59 fps
MRender 3.38
Gravity 0.93
Splatting 2
2% 2.1 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.33%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel X18-M 160GB
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2CV1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 51 51 52 31 28 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
27.1% Poor
Read 201
Write 66.8
Mixed 65.2
SusWrite 46
21% 94.8 MB/s
4K Read 13.6
4K Write 14.8
4K Mixed 8
39% 12.1 MB/s
DQ Read 152
DQ Write 62.9
DQ Mixed 51.5
53% 88.8 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT51264BF160B.C16F 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
24.7% Poor
MC Read 7.9
MC Write 7
MC Mixed 10.5
24% 8.47 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 5.6
SC Mixed 6.6
18% 6.3 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 24.7%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback