Asrock Z77 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics28% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock Z77 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120418
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 17 '16 at 10:33
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570K-$50
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
76.9% Very good
Memory 73.6
1-Core 110
2-Core 217
74% 133 Pts
4-Core 463
8-Core 464
62% 464 Pts
64-Core 467
29% 467 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
MSI(1462 2847) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6510
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
28% Poor
Lighting 33.3
Reflection 18.5
Parallax 38.6
27% 30.1 fps
MRender 43.3
Gravity 31.1
Splatting 35.6
30% 36.7 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 28%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 830 256GB-$261
49GB free
Firmware: 3B1Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
86% Excellent
Read 508
Write 409
Mixed 453
102% 456 MB/s
4K Read 23.5
4K Write 74.6
4K Mixed 24.1
106% 40.7 MB/s
DQ Read 291
DQ Write 106
DQ Mixed 71.8
86% 156 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 86%
Great: 86%
Crucial M4 128GB-$116
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 000F Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
62.9% Good
Read 489
Write 183
Mixed 267
69% 313 MB/s
4K Read 25.9
4K Write 92.8
4K Mixed 6.1
96% 41.6 MB/s
DQ Read 136
DQ Write 117
DQ Mixed 7.32
38% 86.6 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 72%
Intel Raid 1 Volume 2TB
209GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
57.4% Above average
Read 90.8
Write 110
Mixed 93.7
74% 98 MB/s
4K Read 0.61
4K Write 0.98
4K Mixed 0.62
112% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 123%
Fujitsu MHV2200B 200GB
35GB free
Firmware: 004F Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
20.2% Poor
Read 35.5
Write 34.7
Mixed 33.4
26% 34.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 0.96
4K Mixed 0.26
65% 0.56 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 20.2%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsZ DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
55.6% Above average
MC Read 21.8
MC Write 22.5
MC Mixed 19.6
61% 21.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 9.8
27% 9.33 GB/s
Latency 93.4
43% 93.4 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z77 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 4,052 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4 - $158

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $488
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $83
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback