Asus P6T

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics12.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P6T  (all builds)
Memory3.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100308
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 13 '19 at 11:17
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-920-$90
LGA1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
48.6% Average
Memory 76.6
1-Core 36.2
2-Core 72.9
42% 61.9 Pts
4-Core 115
8-Core 192
19% 154 Pts
64-Core 197
12% 197 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI HD 4870
AMD(1002 0502) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.7000
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
12.5% Very poor
Lighting 15.7
Reflection 13.4
Parallax 11.4
13% 13.5 fps
MRender 11.2
Gravity 11.6
Splatting 19.2
12% 14 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 12%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 1.5TB (2009)-$150
362GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 59 51 58 60 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
26.9% Poor
Read 37.3
Write 44.2
Mixed 30.6
SusWrite 56.2
31% 42.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
108% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 26.9%
Great: 55%
WD WD5002ABYS-02B1B0 500GB
29GB free
Firmware: 02.03B02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 69 64 73 76 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
47.2% Average
Read 92.7
Write 93.5
Mixed 61.8
SusWrite 71.5
59% 79.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
179% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 64%
WD WD3200JD-22K 320GB
34GB free
Firmware: 08.05J08
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 54 54 54 54 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
26.5% Poor
Read 38
Write 37.3
Mixed 29.9
SusWrite 53.6
29% 39.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
177% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 26.5%
Great: 36%
WD WD3200JS-63PDB1 320GB
35GB free
Firmware: 21.00M21
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 46 47 54 56 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
29.4% Poor
Read 51
Write 48.5
Mixed 40.4
SusWrite 50.7
35% 47.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
174% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 36%
WD Elements 25A1 3TB
435GB free, PID 25a1
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 67 67 66 67 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
18.1% Very poor
Read 8.7
Write 21.2
Mixed 22.2
SusWrite 65.8
45% 29.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.1
32% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 18.1%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6x2GB
6 of 6 slots used
12GB DIMM
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
38.8% Below average
MC Read 14.9
MC Write 11.9
MC Mixed 15.2
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 9.1
23% 8 GB/s
Latency 87.2
46% 87.2 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P6T Builds (Compare 1,177 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P6T

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $318
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback