Acer Aspire R3-131T

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.58% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemAcer Aspire R3-131T  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire R3-131T
Memory1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150525
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJan 13 '19 at 06:24
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N3050
CHV, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
26.3% Poor
Memory 45.6
1-Core 21.7
2-Core 43.5
25% 36.9 Pts
4-Core 42.7
8-Core 43
6% 42.8 Pts
64-Core 43.2
3% 43.2 Pts
Poor: 8%
This bench: 26.3%
Great: 27%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics
Acer(1025 1022) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4352
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
1.58% Terrible
Lighting 1.67
Reflection 2.77
Parallax 2.41
1% 2.28 fps
MRender 2.57
Gravity 1.7
Splatting 2.91
2% 2.39 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.58%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Cruzer Force 16GB
9GB free, PID 557d
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.4 4.1 4.3 4.4 4.2 4.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
4.96% Terrible
Read 17.5
Write 4.3
Mixed 6.7
SusWrite 4.3
9% 8.2 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.3
31% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 4.96%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5469-045.A00LF 1x4GB
1 of 1 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 3 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
18.1% Very poor
MC Read 5.4
MC Write 8.5
MC Mixed 5.4
18% 6.43 GB/s
SC Read 2.9
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 4
11% 3.97 GB/s
Latency 178
22% 178 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 18.1%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire R3-131T Builds (Compare 121 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire R3-131T

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback