Alienware ASM100

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.29% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemAlienware ASM100  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 03V3TG
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20140820
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 12 '19 at 22:22
Run Duration251 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4765T
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
67.5% Good
Memory 83.6
1-Core 77.5
2-Core 151
62% 104 Pts
4-Core 279
8-Core 401
43% 340 Pts
64-Core 400
25% 400 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GPU
Dell(1028 066A) 2GB
CLim: 1097 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 378.78
Relative performance (0th percentile)
5.29% Terrible
Lighting 0.07
Reflection 16
Parallax 20.3
0% 12.1 fps
MRender 23.5
Gravity 21.9
Splatting 13.6
16% 19.7 fps
Poor: 14%
This bench: 5.29%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST2000LM003 HN-M201RAD 2TB
846GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2BC10002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 34 21 19 26 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
9.04% Terrible
Read 5.5
Write 30
Mixed 8
SusWrite 26
13% 17.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.1
19% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 9.04%
Great: 70%
WD Elements 107C 5TB
869GB free, PID 107c
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 111 108 110 111 110 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
59.1% Above average
Read 179
Write 156
Mixed 101
SusWrite 110
177% 136 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.1
139% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 66%
WD Elements 107C 3TB
667GB free, PID 107c
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 37 36 37 37 36 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
20.9% Poor
Read 36.8
Write 35.3
Mixed 29
SusWrite 36.5
47% 34.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
119% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 20.9%
Great: 58%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 3TB
935GB free, PID d010
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 18 18 18 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
14.8% Very poor
Read 37.5
Write 38.3
Mixed 34
SusWrite 18.1
43% 32 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.4
74% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 59%
130GB free, PID ac00
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 17 17 17 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
7.31% Terrible
Read 18.3
Write 14.5
Mixed 12
SusWrite 16.7
20% 15.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.4
25% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 7.31%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173EB0-YK0 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
55.3% Above average
MC Read 20.6
MC Write 21.2
MC Mixed 17.2
56% 19.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 13.9
SC Mixed 16.4
41% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 74.2
54% 74.2 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ASM100 Builds (Compare 540 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Alienware ASM100

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $139
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $42SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback