Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 63% Destroyer	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 52% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	93% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	96.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20140106
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 12 '19 at 19:25
Run Duration	153 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	66.3% Good	Memory 87.7 1-Core 74.1 2-Core 145 62% 102 Pts	4-Core 244 8-Core 439 41% 341 Pts	64-Core 430 27% 430 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 66.3% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% EVGA(3842 6276) CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 417.35 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	93% Outstanding	Lighting 118 Reflection 124 Parallax 116 96% 119 fps	MRender 102 Gravity 108 Splatting 108 87% 106 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 93% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Mknssdtr 1TB-3DX 1TB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 296GB free (System drive) Firmware: R020 SusWrite @10s intervals: 320 408 405 403 405 406 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	96.9% Outstanding	Read 426 Write 388 Mixed 385 SusWrite 391 90% 398 MB/s	4K Read 30.1 4K Write 88 4K Mixed 41.3 145% 53.1 MB/s	DQ Read 252 DQ Write 244 DQ Mixed 229 177% 241 MB/s
Poor: 85% ↑ This bench: 96.9% Great: 101%
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB 26,179 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 258GB free Firmware: 01.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 62 60 62 62 60 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	35.8% Below average	Read 63.4 Write 59.7 Mixed 41.3 SusWrite 61.1 42% 56.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 143% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 35.8% Great: 51%
WD RE4 1TB (2010)-$54 23,775 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 193GB free Firmware: 01.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 81 81 81 81 81 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	44.6% Average	Read 73.7 Write 72.4 Mixed 60.4 SusWrite 81 53% 71.9 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1 201% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 44.6% Great: 76%
WD WD1002FBYS-02A6B0 1TB 28,278 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 233GB free Firmware: 03.00C06 SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 95 94 95 95 95 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	54.8% Above average	Read 95.9 Write 89.9 Mixed 65.5 SusWrite 94.6 64% 86.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1 193% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 54.8% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1866 C9 4x4GB 5,448 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz Performing below potential (20^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	49% Average	MC Read 20 MC Write 15.4 MC Mixed 17.6 50% 17.7 GB/s	SC Read 11.1 SC Write 8.3 SC Mixed 11.8 30% 10.4 GB/s	Latency 69.8 57% 69.8 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 49% Great: 86%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,065 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $200

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	565x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	138x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	80x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	67x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	62x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	59x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $75Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	41x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	40x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	33x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	37x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	24x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	18x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $605

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16