Asus P8P67 LE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics21.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P8P67 LE  (all builds)
Memory6.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130912
Uptime3.1 Days
Run DateJan 12 '19 at 14:23
Run Duration185 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
72.6% Very good
Memory 94
1-Core 104
2-Core 186
76% 128 Pts
4-Core 298
8-Core 304
40% 301 Pts
64-Core 384
24% 384 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6950-$290
Sapphire(174B E182) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
21.6% Poor
Lighting 26.8
Reflection 23.1
Parallax 26
22% 25.3 fps
MRender 21.6
Gravity 23.8
Splatting 29.9
21% 25.1 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 21.6%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDSC2KW180H6 180GB
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LSF036C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 113 90 81 81 81 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
50.2% Above average
Read 384
Write 346
Mixed 344
SusWrite 98.4
66% 293 MB/s
4K Read 16
4K Write 40.8
4K Mixed 22.2
74% 26.3 MB/s
DQ Read 87.2
DQ Write 168
DQ Mixed 205
134% 153 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 91%
Intel 530 Series 240GB-$149
206GB free
Firmware: DC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 209 227 225 221 220 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
67.4% Good
Read 350
Write 255
Mixed 276
SusWrite 218
62% 275 MB/s
4K Read 25.5
4K Write 58
4K Mixed 33
112% 38.8 MB/s
DQ Read 29.7
DQ Write 211
DQ Mixed 119
92% 120 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 91%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
243GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 64 58 56 61 63 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
36.5% Below average
Read 66
Write 62.8
Mixed 46.1
SusWrite 60.8
43% 58.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
112% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 59%
Samsung HD103SI 1TB-$89
814GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 62 62 62 62 63 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
34.1% Below average
Read 56.1
Write 68.5
Mixed 44.3
SusWrite 62.5
43% 57.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 59%
Intenso Micro Line 4GB
4GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.7 1.7 3.5 1.4 1.4 3.5 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 17.2
Write 3.5
SusWrite 2
7% 7.57 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
10% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMX4GX3M2A1600C9 029E CMZ8GX3M2A2133C11 029E CMX4GX3M2A1600C9 029E CMZ8GX3M2A2133C11 12GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
59.9% Above average
MC Read 19.5
MC Write 22.7
MC Mixed 19.5
59% 20.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 17.7
51% 17.9 GB/s
Latency 59.7
67% 59.7 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67 LE Builds (Compare 1,248 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 LE - $113

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $635
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback