Gigabyte GA-F2A88XM-D3HP

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 55% Gunboat	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	36.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-F2A88XM-D3HP (all builds)
Memory	5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20151224
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Jan 12 '19 at 13:27
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon X4 845-$50 6,391 User benchmarks, average bench 45% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	49.8% Average	Memory 64.3 1-Core 70.2 2-Core 91.5 48% 75.3 Pts	4-Core 202 8-Core 221 28% 211 Pts	64-Core 219 14% 219 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 49.8% Great: 54%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 680-$360 38,995 User benchmarks, average bench 32% Nvidia(10DE 0969) 2GB CLim: 1296 MHz, MLim: 1571 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 399.24 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	36.2% Below average	Lighting 43.8 Reflection 39.3 Parallax 51.3 36% 44.8 fps	MRender 53 Gravity 49.8 Splatting 37.1 37% 46.7 fps
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 36.2% Great: 35%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 8GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1D1 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 333 Write 154 Mixed 200 50% 229 MB/s	4K Read 20.8 4K Write 59.9 4K Mixed 22.7 92% 34.5 MB/s	DQ Read 215 DQ Write 192 DQ Mixed 110 108% 172 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 100%
WD WD1000FYPS-01ZKB0 1TB 1,867 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 33GB free Firmware: 02.01B01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 54 57 57 57 51 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	32.3% Below average	Read 57.3 Write 54 Mixed 45.7 SusWrite 54.7 39% 52.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.8 149% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 32.3% Great: 44%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83 138,859 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 94GB free Firmware: 1AJ10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 86 87 87 88 87 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	48.2% Average	Read 80.2 Write 36.8 Mixed 52.5 SusWrite 87.3 47% 64.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1.1 196% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 48.2% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5773CH0- 4x2GB 21 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (22^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	34.7% Below average	MC Read 15.3 MC Write 8 MC Mixed 14.4 36% 12.6 GB/s	SC Read 7.2 SC Write 6.8 SC Mixed 10 23% 8 GB/s	Latency 116 35% 116 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 34.7% Great: 81%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-F2A88XM-D3HP Builds (Compare 151 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 45%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A88XM-D3HP

CPU
A10-7860K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMD $175Bench 43%, 12,658 samples	24x
A10-7870K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMD $135Bench 46%, 9,821 samples	17x
A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 42%, 31,243 samples	14x

GPU
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 25,284 samples	28x
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 22,117 samples	20x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	8x

SSD
BX500 240GBCrucial $29Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	8x
MX500 500GBCrucial $53Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	6x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	4x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 1x8GBKingstonBench 31%, 4,775 samples	8x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GBKingstonBench 41%, 7,567 samples	5x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 46%, 10,715 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 44% - Average

Total price: $204

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16