Samsung 550P5C/550P7C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive82.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemSamsung 550P5C/550P7C  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG SAMSUNG_NP1234567890
Memory1.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit색, 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140617
Uptime3.2 Days
Run DateJan 12 '19 at 11:23
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3230M-$100
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
60.9% Good
Memory 89
1-Core 82
2-Core 142
64% 104 Pts
4-Core 193
8-Core 191
26% 192 Pts
64-Core 194
12% 194 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C0D1) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4242
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
3.4% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 7.85
Parallax 2.75
3% 4.8 fps
MRender 3.62
Gravity 2.23
Splatting 7.61
4% 4.49 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.4%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
165GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 313 282 284 271 259 250 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
82.7% Excellent
Read 448
Write 410
Mixed 366
SusWrite 277
84% 375 MB/s
4K Read 27.1
4K Write 45.5
4K Mixed 33.7
108% 35.4 MB/s
DQ Read 340
DQ Write 288
DQ Mixed 329
242% 319 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 82.7%
Great: 124%
Seagate ST500LM012 HN-M500MBB 500GB
418GB free
Firmware: 2BA30001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 88 88 88 88 88 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
51% Above average
Read 90.7
Write 60.5
Mixed 49.7
SusWrite 86.9
53% 71.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
149% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 51%
Great: 59%
SanDisk Ultra Flair USB 3.0 64GB-$7
16GB free, PID 5591
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 18 16 16 16 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
14.1% Very poor
Read 30
Write 17
Mixed 20.5
SusWrite 16.4
27% 21 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1.4
121% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
30.4% Below average
MC Read 10.1
MC Write 9.6
MC Mixed 8.7
27% 9.47 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 9.8
SC Mixed 9.8
28% 9.93 GB/s
Latency 68.5
58% 68.5 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 550P5C/550P7C Builds (Compare 602 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 550P5C/550P7C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $448
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback