HP EliteBook 8440p

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 36% Jet ski	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.71% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	HP EliteBook 8440p (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 172A
Memory	2.6 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20151111
Uptime	0.7 Days
Run Date	Jan 12 '19 at 09:23
Run Duration	150 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	46%

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 M 520-$70 23,644 User benchmarks, average bench 40% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	39.7% Below average	Memory 64.7 1-Core 51.7 2-Core 84.2 43% 66.9 Pts	4-Core 82.2 8-Core 125 13% 104 Pts	64-Core 152 9% 152 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 39.7% Great: 47%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz) 99,513 User benchmarks, average bench 1% HP(103C 172A) 2.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	0.71% Terrible	Lighting 0.73 Reflection 0.88 Parallax 0.84 1% 0.82 fps	MRender 1.24 Gravity 0.77 Splatting 1.35 1% 1.12 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.71% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 42GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,704 Write 1,071 Mixed 925 272% 1,233 MB/s	4K Read 106 4K Write 77.8 4K Mixed 79.5 303% 87.7 MB/s	DQ Read 431 DQ Write 441 DQ Mixed 396 308% 423 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Ricoh SD Disk Device 16GB 498 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 4GB free Firmware: 01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.6 7.7 7.5 7.5 7.8 8.1 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	6.35% Terrible	Read 14 Write 6.5 Mixed 11.6 SusWrite 7.7 7% 9.95 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.4 102% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.35% Great: 27%
Verbatim Store n Go V3 USB 3.0 128GB-$51 274 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 27GB free, PID 0243 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 33 29 29 33 29 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	23.5% Poor	Read 103 Write 50 Mixed 24.4 SusWrite 30.4 59% 51.9 MB/s	4K Read 8.2 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 1.8 92% 3.33 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 23.5% Great: 46%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6GB 111,301 User benchmarks, average bench 25% null MHz 2048, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	22.9% Poor	MC Read 7.8 MC Write 6.7 MC Mixed 9.2 23% 7.9 GB/s	SC Read 5.2 SC Write 4.8 SC Mixed 5.8 15% 5.27 GB/s	Latency 115 35% 115 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 22.9% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical EliteBook 8440p Builds (Compare 315 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 40%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 8440p

CPU
Core i5 M 520Intel $70Bench 40%, 23,644 samples	110x
Core i7 M 620IntelBench 42%, 9,076 samples	62x
Core i5 M 540IntelBench 41%, 8,329 samples	53x

GPU
NVS 3100MNvidiaBench 1%, 9,073 samples	293x
HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples	22x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	8x
MX500 500GBCrucial $53Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	7x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	5x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	122x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	103x
6GBUnknownBench 25%, 111,301 samples	51x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 48% - Average

Total price: $98

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16