Asus CROSSHAIR VI HERO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive222% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus CROSSHAIR VI HERO  (all builds)
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181207
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 12 '19 at 05:26
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X-$235
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
78.2% Very good
Memory 72
1-Core 113
2-Core 226
75% 137 Pts
4-Core 453
8-Core 721
72% 587 Pts
64-Core 1,192
74% 1,192 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
EVGA(3842 6699) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 417.35
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 39.6
Reflection 45.8
Parallax 37
32% 40.8 fps
Gravity 39.7
Splatting 51.7
41% 45.7 fps
Poor: 109% Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$330
310GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 899 854 835 834 844 837 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
222% Outstanding
Read 1,886
Write 1,152
Mixed 796
SusWrite 850
260% 1,171 MB/s
4K Read 46.7
4K Write 133
4K Mixed 59.2
217% 79.6 MB/s
DQ Read 898
DQ Write 370
DQ Mixed 466
389% 578 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 222%
Great: 283%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 1TB
852GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 324 306 321 323 319 318 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
90.7% Outstanding
Read 483
Write 462
Mixed 281
SusWrite 318
86% 386 MB/s
4K Read 28.6
4K Write 78.7
4K Mixed 35.6
131% 47.6 MB/s
DQ Read 319
DQ Write 212
DQ Mixed 171
153% 234 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 90.7%
Great: 117%
PNY USB 3.0 FD 34GB
32GB free, PID 00ad
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 21 19 19 18 21 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
25.7% Poor
Read 112
Write 23.7
Mixed 49.8
SusWrite 19.2
56% 51 MB/s
4K Read 5.9
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 2.1
138% 3.1 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 25.7%
Great: 29%
TRON: Legacy 4GB
4GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.9 3.1 3 2.9 3.1 3 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
4.63% Terrible
Read 16.2
Write 1.8
Mixed 2.5
SusWrite 3
6% 5.88 MB/s
4K Read 6.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
26% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 1%
This bench: 4.63%
Great: 5%
General USB Flash Disk 32GB
20GB free, PID 8381
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 14 14 12 14 14 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
18.3% Very poor
Read 80.7
Write 8
Mixed 6
SusWrite 13.6
24% 27.1 MB/s
4K Read 15.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
58% 5.17 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 18.3%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$55
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
74.1% Very good
MC Read 29.1
MC Write 25.1
MC Mixed 25.9
76% 26.7 GB/s
SC Read 19
SC Write 27.2
SC Mixed 21.8
65% 22.7 GB/s
Latency 96.8
41% 96.8 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CROSSHAIR VI HERO Builds (Compare 1,759 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus CROSSHAIR VI HERO - $227

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $1,127
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback