Asrock B250M-HDV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics43.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive91.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock B250M-HDV  (all builds)
Memory13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170210
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 12 '19 at 05:06
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400-$79
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
74.8% Very good
Memory 84.5
1-Core 106
2-Core 210
76% 134 Pts
4-Core 373
8-Core 396
51% 385 Pts
64-Core 401
25% 401 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
MSI(1462 809E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1266 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.1.1
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
43.1% Average
Lighting 51.1
Reflection 64.2
Parallax 75.5
42% 63.6 fps
MRender 65.1
Gravity 50.4
Splatting 54.4
46% 56.6 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 53%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Mushkin Chronos Deluxe 240GB-$181
197GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 502ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 202 176 219 216 216 194 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
91.6% Outstanding
Read 374
Write 256
Mixed 285
SusWrite 204
63% 280 MB/s
4K Read 35.5
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 44
170% 64.1 MB/s
DQ Read 297
DQ Write 252
DQ Mixed 242
190% 263 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 91.6%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS8G4D240FSB.16FBR2 88F1 Leorice4XPC8G24C15 16GB
2400, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
69.7% Good
MC Read 25.5
MC Write 27.4
MC Mixed 20.9
70% 24.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 27
SC Mixed 21.4
61% 21.3 GB/s
Latency 72.6
55% 72.6 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B250M-HDV Builds (Compare 1,380 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock B250M-HDV - $52

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $306
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback