Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 70% Battleship	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	7.38% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	55% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-4160-$79 48,506 User benchmarks, average bench 55% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	70.4% Very good	Memory 91.8 1-Core 108 2-Core 178 75% 126 Pts	4-Core 285 8-Core 286 38% 286 Pts	64-Core 285 18% 285 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 70.4% Great: 67%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 7730 3,247 User benchmarks, average bench 6% MSI(1462 2795) 1GB CLim: 800 MHz, MLim: 1125 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 18.12.2 Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	7.38% Terrible	Lighting 8.27 Reflection 11.7 Parallax 10.9 7% 10.3 fps	MRender 10.4 Gravity 8.07 Splatting 12.3 9% 10.3 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 7.38% Great: 7%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Anacomda T1 240GB SSD 25 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 60GB free (System drive) Firmware: V3.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 344 146 128 133 130 131 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	55% Above average	Read 421 Write 66.9 Mixed 125 SusWrite 169 43% 196 MB/s	4K Read 28.4 4K Write 35.5 4K Mixed 12.1 77% 25.3 MB/s	DQ Read 144 DQ Write 103 DQ Mixed 14.7 40% 87.2 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 55% Great: 80%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 1x8GB 3,584 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	34.3% Below average	MC Read 11.8 MC Write 10.9 MC Mixed 9.5 31% 10.7 GB/s	SC Read 10.5 SC Write 12.2 SC Mixed 11.8 33% 11.5 GB/s	Latency 64.4 62% 64.4 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 34.3% Great: 34%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples	4x
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	4x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	3x

SSD
SU650 240GBAdata $70Bench 70%, 47,016 samples	2x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $36Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	2x
MZ7LN128HAHQ-000H1 128GBSamsungBench 87%, 714 samples	2x

RAM
99U5471-054.A00LF 2x8GBKingstonBench 53%, 9,823 samples	2x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	2x
DDR3 1600 1x8GBUnknownBench 29%, 1,440 samples	2x

Value: 61% - Good

Total price: $205